North Walpole NH man missing

share Source: sentinelsource.com WALPOLE — Police are searching for a missing Walpole man after his vehicle was found near his home early Friday morning.
sent this using ShareThis.

Minutes and feet apart

Taylor and Tessa were born on Wednesday September 24, 2008..... a few short minutes apart with only a wall between them. Dan walked around the hospital floor like a proud new daddy and stopped at our door when he found out we were there too to show off his precious little bundle. We were some of the first people to meet little Tessa. Jessica and I talked about getting our girls together one of these days to play when I ran into her a little while back. The next morning I ran into Dan and Tessa just after her pictures with easter Bunny. It was only the second time I met Little Tessa... I never thought that that would be the last. Tessa passed away last night. They are not sure still of the exact cause...but the cause doesn't matter to me. I'm heartbroken and shredded by this. My heart goes out to Jessica and to Dan. I know at least she has Laurie Kathryn, Emily and Emy's little one up there to play with, but it still doesn't make it any better down here. Jessica and Dan, I'm beyond sorry.

Stringer Funeral Home Online Memorial (and obit)

Facebook Online Memorial

Crash Update

Tabitha Royce, 33, of Charlestown, N.H., died at Springfield Hospital in Vermont, police said.

wmur.com

River rescue under way of trapped motorist - Tuesday, Mar. 16, 2010

River rescue under way of trapped motorist - Tuesday, Mar. 16, 2010

Posted using ShareThis

SentinalSource.com article

Walpole Wild pursuit; 2 men charged

By PHILLIP BANTZ
Sentinel Staff
Published: Tuesday, February 23, 2010
After stealing beer and leading police on a high-speed chase that involved a crash and a near-collision with an officer, a drunken Walpole youth and man were arrested early Monday morning, authorities said.

Andrew T. Laacanen, 18, is charged with reckless conduct, disobeying a police officer and reckless operation.

Jeremy A. Provencher, 26, is charged with disobeying a police officer and driving after being deemed a habitual offender of motor vehicle laws.


Full article here

Some 'more informative' information about Vermont Yankee and Tritium

The Energy Collective: Comparing a leak of Tritium that causes a flurry to two oil leaks that are virtually ignored


Another nugget from theenergycollective.com


The above author's blog which has even more info....

Tritium and Bananas


This last one is a report that by Richard Heaps detailing the economic impact of VY.

"This study estimated the impact of the Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC Power Station(the “VY Station”) on the economy of Windham County and the state of Vermont in 2009. The study was conducted at the request of the IBEW Local 300 and was conducted independently of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee."

I received it as a PDF so there's no link other than the for Northern Economic Consulting, inc, which is www.vteconomy.com.

Its long, just to warn you. But here it is:

N O R T H E R N E C O N O M I C C O N S U L T I N G, I N C.
PUBLISHING THE VERMONT ECONOMY NEWSLETTER SINCE 1991
669 CAMBRIDGE ROAD • WESTFORD, VT 05494 • (802) 879-7774 • cell: (802) 318-7374
email: rheaps@vteconomy.com • web page http://www.vteconomy.com
The Economic Impact
of
the VY Station
Prepared for the
IBEW Local 300
South Burlington, Vermont
Prepared by:
Richard W. Heaps
January 31, 2010
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page i
Executive Summary
This study estimated the impact of the Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC Power Station
(the “VY Station”) on the economy of Windham County and the state of Vermont in 2009. The
study was conducted at the request of the IBEW Local 300 and was conducted independently of
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee.
In 2009 there were about 670 employees, including contract employees, at the VY Station with a
payroll of about approximately $68 million. The economic impact that year from this
employment and payroll was very large.
• The total number of jobs created in Windham County in 2009 due to the presence of the
VY Station equaled 1,064. Elsewhere in Vermont an additional 224 jobs existed in 2009
to the existence of the VY Station. Therefore, the total number of jobs created in the
state of Vermont by the VY Station equals 1,288.
• The total payroll created at all Windham County employers by the presence of the VY
Station equals $84.2 million in 2009. Payrolls at employers in the rest of Vermont were
$9.1 million higher than otherwise due to the presence of the VY Station. In total, the
VY Station led to a payroll increase throughout Vermont that totaled approximately
$93.3 million in 2009.
• In 2009 the disposable income of Windham County residents was $64.5 million higher
due to the presence of the VY Station than it would be otherwise. Elsewhere in the state,
disposable income was $14.0 million higher due to the VY Station. In total, disposable
income of all Vermont residents was $78.5 million higher in 2009 than otherwise due to
the presence of the VY Station.
• It is clear that the operation of the VY Station in Vernon had a large and positive
economic impact on Vermont in 2009, creating 1,288 jobs, a payroll of $93.3 million,
and raising disposable incomes by $78.5 million.
• Throughout the difficult period of the current recession, when jobs were declining
throughout the state, the VY Station has held its employment steady. And the
employment the VY Station created through the multiplier process also remained steady.
Not only is the VY Station a large employer in the state with significant impacts that spill
over to other firms, it is also a very stable employer, a characteristic that this recession
shows is extremely valuable to the state’s economy.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page ii
• The VY Station and the economic activity which it generated throughout the state paid
$7.67 million in General Fund taxes in 2009, out of the total of $1,102 million received
by the State.
• The VY Station and the economic activity which it generated throughout the state paid
$4.94 million in Education Fund taxes in 2009, out of the total of $1,320.6 million
received by the State. The $4.94 million in revenues received from the VY Station were
enough to cover the entire cost of educating 352 Vermont students in 2009.
• Finally, the VY Station has sold electricity to Vermont distribution firms at prices below
what they would have had to pay otherwise. From 2002 to 2009 these savings have
exceeded $300 million. We estimate that for every $10 million in savings from lower
electricity costs to Vermont households, there were 64 more jobs created throughout
Vermont with a payroll of $2.4 million in 2009.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page iii
Table of Contents
I. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1
II. The VY Station in 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 2
III. The Total Economic Impact of the VY Station . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 4
IV. The Importance of the VY Station to the Vermont Economy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7
V. The Importance of the VY Station to Windham County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 11
VI. The Impact of the VY Station on State Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 16
VII. The Impact on Consumers of Favorable Electricity Prices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 18
VIII. Appendix - Methodology of this Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 19
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 1
I. Introduction
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC operates a nuclear powered electrical energy generation
plant in Vernon, Vermont. The IBEW Local 300 asked Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. to
estimate the economic impact of the operation of this power station (the “VY Station”) on the
Vermont and Windham County economies. This report presents the findings from that analysis.
We first present a basic description of the operations of the VY Station in section II. In section
III we present our estimate of the economic impact of the VY Station on the state and Windham
County in 2009. It is necessary to have an understanding of the state’s and county’s economy to
order to grasp the importance of this economic impact to the local residents. In sections IV and
V we discuss the importance of the VY Station’s employment and payroll to Vermont and
Windham County residents.
The VY Station and the economic activity it created generated considerable tax revenues for the
General Fund and Education Fund of the State of Vermont. In section VI we present estimates
of the revenues generated for these funds by the VY Station in FY09.
Lastly, the pricing of electricity produced by the VY Station has been below market rates for
Vermont’s electric utilities and, hence, their customers. The economic impact of this favorable
pricing is discussed in section VII.
This analysis gives a comprehensive overview of the impact of the VY Station on the economy
of Vermont as a whole and Windham County in particular.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 2
II. The VY Station in 2009
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC operates nuclear powered electrical energy generation
plant in Vernon, Vermont along the Connecticut River. The plant, referred to in this report as
the VY Station, began operations in November 1972 and has a license to operate until March
2012. Entergy purchased the plant from its Vermont owners in 2002. Prior to 2002, VY was
owned by Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation (VYNPC), a single asset entity owned in
turn by eight New England utilities (of which Vermont utilities owned 55%).
The business of the VY Station is to produce and sell electrical power to wholesale customers.
The VY Station is Vermont's single largest energy supply source. In 2003, the VY Station
supplied almost 35% of Vermont’s energy requirements and almost 28% of its peak load.
The VY Station is a nominal 540 MW capacity Boiling Water Reactor. The plant has a
maximum dependable capacity of 605 MW. Through 2003, VY generated an annual average of
over 3.4 billion kWh, achieving a cumulative output approaching 80% of its maximum potential.
In 2003, a year without a refueling outage, it operated at a capacity factor of 99.5%. In 2001 and
2002 (years with refueling outages) it operated at an average capacity factor of 91%.
The VY Station’s operations are located entirely in Windham County in southern Vermont. The
VY power station is in the town of Vernon and there is a small training center in Brattleboro. In
addition, Entergy VY contracts out for some maintenance and food services with local firms
which, from an economic perspective, adds to its total employment. Lastly, the nuclear power
plant routinely shuts down for refueling bringing in a large number of outside employees who
are specialized in this process.
The total economic impact of the VY Station on Vermont and Windham County depends several
factors: the employment and wages paid at the VY Station and to its contractors, the spending of
its contractors during outages, and the price savings which Vermont residents and businesses
enjoy. This report will mainly focus on the single most important factor — the employment and
wages paid at the VY Station and to its contractors. The impact of the spending of contractors
during outages, while very important to local innkeepers and restauranteurs, has a very minor
impact compared to the impact of the wages and employment at the VY Station and, therefore, is
not addressed in this report.
Finally, the VY Station has sold electricity to Vermont distribution firms (Green Mountain
Power, Central Vermont Public Service, and the Vermont Electric Cooperative) at prices below
that which they would have had to pay otherwise. From 2002 to 2009 these savings have
exceeded $300 million according to the Vermont Energy Partnership. In the recession year of
2009 the savings were lower as the price of wholesale electricity declined. From an ongoing
evaluation of the economic benefits of the VY Station, future energy prices from the plant and on
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 3
the market are hard to determine. Including any benefits from favorable prices in 2009 would
make it difficult to determine the benefits from the employment and wages of the VY Station
alone, which is the major source of the economic benefit of the plant. Therefore, no price
savings were used in the central analysis of this report. The economic impact of the favorable
pricing is addressed at the conclusion of this report.
The total employment and wages of the VY Station in 2009 was the sum the following two
activities:
• The VY Station Employment - In 2009 the VY Station had 642 employees working at
the power station and training center combined. In that year VY Station employees were
paid approximately $67 million in wages and bonuses. This implies an average wage and
bonus earnings of VY Station employees of just under $104,000 in 2009. Total earnings
can vary year to year based on the performance of the plant (number and length of
outages, etc.) and the use of contractors versus in-house labor. Earnings information
since 2004 show that 2009 was a fairly “normal” year for earnings.
(Note: readers of past economic analyses of the VY Station will notice that the plant has
changed it usage of contractors, accounting for significant changes in earnings reported
for VY Station employees versus its contractors. Care should be taken with comparisons
from other reports on the VY Station to account for these changes, although total
employment and earnings (plant plus contractors) has been reasonably steady.)
• Contracted Employment - By the end of 2009 the VY Station was operating with 25 to
30 contractors on site for food services and ordinary construction purposes. Special
conditions can cause this to rise substantially for brief periods of time, but this is
expected to be the norm for the foreseeable future.
In total, the VY Station had 667 to 672 employees in 2009. For purposes of this report, we will
use 669 employees.
The economic importance of the VY Station on the state’s and Windham County’s economy is
readily apparent from the employment and wages paid directly at the plant. However, in 2009
the full economic impact of VY Station was magnified through the economic multiplier process,
the subject of the next section of this report.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
1 The model is described in the Appendix to this report.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 4
III. The Total Economic Impact of the VY Station
Based on the information in section II we estimated the total impact of the VY Station on
Vermont’s and Windham County’s economy. The impact of the VY Station on the state and
county economy is much greater than that due solely to its own payroll and that of its on-site
contractors. That is because much of the nearly $68 million in payroll is spent at other
businesses, thereby creating additional jobs and additional payroll at other firms throughout the
state. This is known as the multiplier process in economics.
By use of the REDYN model, a dynamic input-output model, we estimate the following impact
of the VY Station on the state and county economy.1
Total Economic Impact of the VY Station in 2009
Jobs
Created
Increased
Wages (in
millions
of 2009 $)
Increased
Disposable
Income (in
millions of
2009 $)
Windham County 1,064 $84.2 $64.5
Rest of Vermont 224 $9.1 $14.0
Total Vermont 1,288 $93.3 $78.5
The Job Impact
• The total number of jobs created in Windham County in 2009 due to the presence of the
VY Station equaled 1,064. The employment at VY Station was 669. Thus, through the
multiplier process, an additional 395 jobs were created in Windham County in 2009 due
to the presence of the VT Station in Vernon.
These jobs include 55 in construction, 53 in retail trade, 42 in accommodations and food
services, 43 in health care and social assistance, and 42 in professional services with the
remainder in other sectors of the economy.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 5
• Elsewhere in Vermont an additional 224 jobs existed in 2009 to the existence of the VY
Station. These jobs included 36 in retail trade, 29 in health care and social assistance, 24
in accommodations and food services, 22 in construction, and 22 in professional services
with the remainder in other sectors of the economy.
• Therefore, the total number of jobs created in the state of Vermont by the VY Station’s
669 jobs equaled 1,288. This implies an employment multiplier of 1.93. This relatively
large multiplier is due to the high wages at the power station itself which generates the
large multiple impact. (Note: 173 additional jobs were created in Cheshire County, New
Hampshire and Franklin County, Massachusetts, but are not counted in this figure.)
The Payroll Impact
• The total payroll created by the presence of the VY Station at all Windham County
employers equaled $84.2 million in 2009. The payroll at the VY Station (including
contractors) was approximately $68 million. Therefore, an additional payroll of about
$16.2 million was created in Windham County outside of the VY Station through the
multiplier process.
• Payrolls at employers in the rest of Vermont were $9.1 million higher than otherwise due
to the presence of the VY Station.
• In total, the VY Station led to a payroll increase at all firms throughout Vermont that
totaled approximately $93.3 million in 2009.
The Disposable Income Impact
The VY Station is located on the Connecticut River in Vernon, Vermont. Most employees of the
plant live near by, which includes towns in New Hampshire and Massachusetts as well as
Vermont In 2009 just over 40% of the employees at the VY Station lived in Vermont.
Therefore, not all of the payroll of the VY Station translates into income gains of Vermont
residents. This can be demonstrated by examining the impact of the VY Station on the
disposable income (essentially after-tax) of Vermont residents.
• In 2009 the disposable income of Windham County residents was $64.5 million higher
due to the presence of the VY Station than it would have been otherwise.
• Elsewhere in the state, disposable income was $14.0 million higher due to the VY
Station.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 6
• Finally, disposable income of all Vermont residents was $78.5 million higher than
otherwise due to the presence of the VY Station.
• The disposable income of residents of Cheshire County, NH and Franklin County, MA
was $18.3 million higher due to the presence of the VY Station.
The Total Impact
It is clear that the operation of the VY Station in Vernon had a large and positive economic
impact throughout Vermont in 2009, creating 1,288 jobs, a payroll of $93.3 million, and raising
disposable incomes by $78.5 million. The importance of these jobs and earnings to the state and
Windham county is the subject of the next two sections of this report.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
2 The employment totals for 2009 are estimates based on QCEW job counts for the first two quarters of the
year and monthly CES job estimates for the state from July through December.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 7
IV. The Importance of the VY Station to the Vermont
Economy
In order to fully understand the importance of the VY Station to the Vermont economy, it is
necessary to review the recent history of the economy’s performance. In this section we briefly
present and examine the state’s employment and income growth over the last ten years. We then
review the near term economic forecast for the state
A. Recent Economic Activity in Vermont and the VY Station
1. Employment and Unemployment
The Vermont Department of Labor publishes an
annual count of the number of payroll jobs at
Vermont businesses. This includes about 80% of
the state’s employment, excluding the selfemployed.
The graph to the right shows the
annual job growth in Vermont from 1999 through
2009.2
During this ten year period the state’s economy
experienced two recessions. The recession in the
early part of this decade was relatively brief and
not as severe as preceding economic downturns.
However, the current recession has been a very
severe recession and is not yet over. Many economists believe it will prove to be the harshest
recession in Vermont since the Great Depression.
Employment in the Vermont began falling in mid 2008, then fell rapidly through 2009. As of the
close of 2009, employment in Vermont has fallen by approximately 11,000 jobs, a decline of
3.6%. In 2009 this was punctuated by workforce reductions at Ethan Allen Furniture (110),
Plasan Carbon Composites (92), Lydall, Inc. (190), IBM (between 250 to 500). Ten of the
state’s 97 automobile dealerships closed as did several major retailers (Circuit City and
Linens n’ Things).
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
3 Revised employment and unemployment estimates for Vermont will be released by the Vermont
Department of Labor in late February 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 8
Throughout this period, the VY Station held its employment steady, near the current number of
669 employees plus contractors. The 619 additional jobs created throughout the state (for a total
of 1,288 jobs) through the multiplier process also remained generally constant. In good
economic times, the VY Station is a major employer in the state. In these difficult economic
times, the importance of the VY Station to the Vermont economy is even greater. The steady
nature of its employment over the business cycle is a clear benefit to Vermonters.
The Vermont Business Magazine lists the VY Station as the 31st largest employer in the state in
2009, with 500 employees in 2009/2010. Using the correct number (669), the VY Station is
actually the 21st largest employer in Vermont.
The Vermont Department of Labor publishes an
annual estimate of the unemployment rate for
Vermont. This is the most frequently used
measure of economic hardship in the regional
labor market. The graph to the right shows the
annual unemployment rate in the state from 1999
to 2009.
Unemployment increased during the recession in
the early part of this decade, then declined to just
3.5% in 2005. It remained fairly steady until the
current recession. For all of 2009 Vermont’s
unemployment rate is currently estimated to be
6.9%.3 In the last two years, the number of unemployed Vermonters has increased from 14,000
to 24,900.
Again it is important to note that throughout this difficult period, the VY Station held its
employment, and the employment it creates through the multiplier process, steady. Even as the
demand for electrical energy declined nationwide during the recession, the low cost of electricity
produced by the VT Station allowed it to sell all it produced and to continue to operate without
any reduction in employment.
2. Wages and Income
Another important measure of economic activity is wages and incomes. The Vermont
Department of Labor publishes an annual average wage per job for the state. In 1999 the
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
4 The 2009 average wage is estimated from the VDOL reports for the first two quarters of 2009.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 9
average was $27,589. By 2009 we estimate this will equal $38,134, an increase of 38% in ten
years.4 For comparison purposes, from 1999 to 2009 the Consumer Price Index increased 28%.
The average wage at the VY Station in 2009 was $104,000 (see section II of this report). This
high wage is a reflection of the job skills needed to operate a nuclear power plant. The jobs at
Vermont Yankee are the very type of high-paying jobs that Vermont policymakers so frequently
call for.
In 2009, total wages at the VY Station equaled about $68 million. In Section III , we estimated
that through the multiplier process the total wages created by the VY Station in Vermont equaled
$93.3 million. This is $8 out of every $1,000 in wages paid by all employers in the State of
Vermont in 2009.
It is also illustrative to look at the resulting
incomes of Vermont residents. Income data can
best be obtained from the Vermont Department
of Taxes, based on data from the state’s personal
income tax. We present the inflation-adjusted
income for the median family in Vermont from
1975 through 2009 in the accompanying graph.
Inflation-adjusted median family income has
grown from about $40,000 in 1975 to $65,000 in
2009. Growth occurs during good economic
times but turns negative in recessions. The
current recession is no different. Inflationadjusted
median family income fell 2.7% in
2008. We estimate it fell another 2.5% in 2009.
The importance of the VY Station to the income of Vermont families is evident in two ways.
First, the average wage of a VY Station worker is higher than the median family income in
Vermont. The jobs at the VY Station are very good-paying jobs. Second, because of the steady
demand for the electricity produced by the VY Station, the earnings of workers at the VY Station
have increased, even in the recession years helping Vermont households maintain their standard
of living in these difficult economic times.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 10
B. The Economic Outlook for Vermont and the VY Station
The New England Economic Partnership (NEEP) prepares biannual forecasts of the economic
outlook for the New England state economies. The following forecast of NEEP was released last
November.
In brief, NEEP expects the Vermont economy to have bottomed out in the fourth quarter of
2009. However, the recovery afterwards will be slow. The state’s labor market will not begin
growing again until the middle of 2010. By then the state’s employers will have cut
approximately 18,000 jobs. NEEP expects job growth will turn positive in 2011, posting a 1.1%
gain that year and 2.7% in 2012. By the end of 2012 the state’s job total will still be below the
pre-recession peak set in 2007. Unemployment in Vermont is expected to continue to rise
through the middle of 2010, hitting a peak of 8.1%.
NEEP forecasts that inflation-adjusted per capita personal income in Vermont will fall 3.4% in
2010 and 1.8% in 2011 before growing slightly in 2012.
In sum, the state’s economy is just now starting to begin a long, slow recovery from the
recession. Employment growth will not resume until later in 2010 and unemployment will rise.
Given the continued demand for the relatively low-priced electricity produced by the VY Station
into the foreseeable future, the number of jobs at the VY Station will remain steady and the
annual earnings of its workers will grow. The VY Station will continue to be a very important
part of the state’s economy through 2011 and, if relicensed, for many years in the future.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
5 The employment totals for 2009 are estimates based on actual job counts for the first two quarters of the
year and monthly job changes for the state from July through December.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 11
V. The Importance of the VY Station to Windham County
In this section we briefly present and examine Windham County’s employment and income
growth over the last ten years. In addition, we review the major demographic changes affecting
the local economy in this period.
It is clear that economic activity in Windham County has significantly lagged that of the rest of
Vermont in recent years. In addition, even as Vermont is a slow growing state from a
demographic perspective, Windham County is even a slower growing area. This suggests that
any major, negative economic impacts will be felt more acutely in Windham County than
elsewhere in Vermont.
A. Recent Economic Activity in Windham County and the VY
Station
1. Employment and Unemployment
The graph to the right shows the annual job
growth in Windham County (the line) versus that
of the State of Vermont (the bars) from 1999
through 2009.5 Job growth in Windham County
has lagged that of the state in nine of the last ten
years. Only in 1999 did Windham County post a
job gain. Windham County has lost jobs every
year since 1999.
From 1999 to 2009 employment in the state grew
by 5.3%, a gain of 15,236 jobs. During that ten
year period jobs decreased in Windham County
by 1,636, a 6.8% decline. Then, when the
recession hit in 2008 and 2009, Windham County employers continued to shed jobs, and at a
faster rate than employers across the state. We estimate employment fell by another 1,200 jobs
in Windham County during the last two years to stand at 21,400 for 2009.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
6 We estimate the 2009 wage based on wage changes in the first two quarters.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 12
As presented in sections II and III of this report, the VY Station had 669 employees in 2009.
This is 3.1% of the total payroll employment in the county. And as presented in section III,
through the multiplier process, the VY Station created a total of 1,064 jobs in the county, fully
5.0% of the county’s jobs. Put another way, one out of every twenty jobs in Windham County
exists due to the presence of the VY Station.
The Vermont Business Magazine lists the VY Station as the second largest employer in
Windham County in 2009, with 500 employees. C&S Wholesalers is the largest with 1,200.
The third largest is Brattleboro Memorial Hospital with 480 employees. Using the correct
number (669), the VY Station is still the second largest employer in Windham County.
The unemployment rate for the state and
Windham County from 1999 through 2009 is
presented in the accompanying graph. Based on
the low job growth in Windham County, it is
initially somewhat surprising that Windham
County’s unemployment rate has remained below
or equal to the state’s rate during the period
under review. In the review of the county’s
demographic’s below, we will see this is not an
indicator of economic vitality in the county, but
rather a reflection of the population decline in the
county.
2. Wages and Income
The Vermont Department of Labor publishes an annual average wage per job for the state and
Windham County. This is shown below.
Average Wage per Job
1999 2008 Change
All Vermont $27,589 $38,134 38%
Windham County $26,782 $36,033 35%
In 2009, we estimate the average wage per job in Vermont was $38,134, up 38% from 1999.6 In
Windham County the average wage increased slightly less, 35%, to $36,033. The average wage
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
7 According to the 2000 U.S. Census, about 4,000 of the 23,000 working Windham County residents
worked outside the county. Over 1,000 crossed the river into New Hampshire’s Cheshire County.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 13
paid at the VY Station ($104,000) shows the critical importance of the wages paid at the VY
Station to the earnings of households in Windham County).
In addition, the total wages paid by the VY Station in 2009 equaled $68 million. This is 8.4% of
the total wages paid in the county. Further, through the multiplier process, we estimated in
section II that the VY Station led to the payment of $84.2 in wages in Windham County. That’s
10.4% of the total or one out of every ten dollars in wages paid in Windham County.
The above figures are wages from jobs in Windham County. Because many county residents
work outside the county, it is also illustrative to look at the resulting incomes of county
residents.7 This can be obtained from the Vermont Department of Taxes, based on data from the
state’s personal income tax. We examine the income for the median family in Vermont and
Windham County, which is available only for 2000 to 2008.
Median Family Income
2000 2008 Change
All Vermont $46,113 $58,069 26%
Windham County $42,045 $51,425 22%
In 2008, the median family income in Vermont was $58,069, up 26% since 2000. In Windham
County, the median family income was $51,425, up 22% since 2000. This income is $6,644 less
than the statewide median. The Windham median family income was the 4th lowest of the
fourteen counties in Vermont, only above the three Northeast Kingdom counties.
In summation, the VY Station is the second largest employer in Windham County, accounting
for one out of every twenty jobs in the county. It is ultimately the source of $1 out of every $10
dollars paid by employers in the county. Given the lack of job growth in the county and the
stability of the employment and earnings at the VY Station, it is hard to understate the
importance of the VY Station to the residents of Windham County.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 14
B. Demographic Changes in Vermont and Windham County
Population data for the state and Windham County is published by the U.S. Bureau of the
Census. The last population count was the decennial census in 2000. Population estimates for
the years after 2000 have been published through 2008 for the counties. Therefore, we review
demographic estimates for the years 2000 to 2008.
1. Total Population
From July 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008, the total resident population of Vermont increased from
609,909 to 621,049. This was a gain of 11,146 or just 1.8% over the eight-year period. Vermont
is one of the slowest growing states in the nation and during this period the annual growth rate
steadily declined to just barely 0.1% or less per year.
During the same period, the population of Windham County declined from 44,157 to 43,176.
The decline equaled 981 or a negative 2.2% in the eight years from 2000 to 2008. Windham
County was one of only four counties in Vermont to lose population over the period. (The other
three were Bennington, Rutland, and Windsor Counties.)
2. Working-Age Population
For purposes of this report, we define the working-age population to include residents aged 25 to
64 years old. During the period 2000 to 2008, the Census Bureau estimates that the workingage
population of Vermont increased from 327,736 to 344,012, a gain of 5%. All of this
occurred from a 24% gain (36,866 people) in the number of older workers aged 45 to 64 — the
Baby Boom generation. The number of younger workers — aged 25 to 44 — actually declined
12% (20,590 people) during this period.
The same general trend can be seen in Windham County from 2000 to 2008, where the workingage
population increased from 24,445 to 24,731, a gain of just 1.2%. As with the state, the gain
in the county was only from increased numbers of older workers aged 45 to 64, which grew
20%. The number of younger workers aged 25 to 44 declined 17% in Windham County from
12,364 to 10,277.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 15
3. Over 65 Population
Finally, the number of Vermonters aged 65 and older increased from 77,746 to 86,649, a gain of
12% from 2000 to 2008. In Windham County, the number increased from 6,176 to 6,265, a gain
of just 3%. This population age cohort will grow rapidly in the coming years with the aging of
the Baby Boom generation.
Vermont is one of the oldest states in the nation, measured by the median age of its population.
In 2008 the median age was 42.3 years, up from 38.7 years in 2000. In 2008 Vermont was the
second oldest state in the nation. In Windham County, the median age is significantly higher —
up from 40.1 years old in 2000 to 44.0 years old in 2008.
4. Demographic Summary
Windham County is losing population and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. The
remaining population is aging and aging faster than the state as a whole. While the working-age
population is still increasing, that will soon slow and then begin declining (by 2012 is the
forecast) as the Baby Boomers retire.
From an economic perspective, a declining population generally means a declining demand from
the regional market for goods and services. A declining labor force means that it will be
increasingly difficult for employers, particularly for those serving the broader U.S. or global
market, to find the labor needed to operate efficiently in Windham County.
A large part of the lack of economic dynamism in Windham County can be explained by its
demographics. This will present a significant challenge to growing the economy of the county
for the foreseeable future. As a consequence, it is crucial to Windham County to hold its
existing employers, particularly those like the VY Station, that have a stable demand for their
products and pay high wages to their employees.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 16
VI. The Impact of the VY Station on State Government
In 2009, the VY Station itself, the employees of the VY Station, and the employees elsewhere in
the state created by the multiplier process all paid taxes into Vermont’s General Fund and
Education Fund. These taxes were a substantial part of the total revenues of the state. In this
section we present an estimate of the major tax revenues which the state received because of the
presence of the VY Station in Vermont.
A. Impact on General Fund Revenues
In section III we estimated that the presence of
the VY Station in Vermont led to the creation of
payrolls in the state totaling $93.3 million. In
2009 we estimate that the General Fund of
Vermont received $3.00 million in personal
income tax payments from these earnings.
In a similar manner the State treasury received
$0.82 million from the retail sales and use
tax, $0.44 million from the meals and rooms
tax, and $0.61 million from all other General
Fund taxes.
In addition, there is a special Electrical Energy
Tax paid into the General Fund which is levied
on the VY Station which totaled $2.8 million in 2009.
In total, VY Station and the economic activity which it generated throughout the state paid $7.67
million in General Fund taxes in 2009, out of the total of $1,102 million received by the State.
General Fund Revenues Received
Because of the VY Station
in 2009
Tax source Revenue
Individual income $3.00
Retail sales & use $0.82
Meals & rooms $0.44
Electrical generation $2.80
All other GF taxes $0.61
====
Total = $7.67 million
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 17
B. Impact on Education Fund Revenues
In 2009 we estimate that the Education Fund of
Vermont received $4.94 million because of the
presence of the VY Station in Vermont.
The VY Station directly paid $2.00 million to
the State Education Fund in 2009. An additional
$0.65 million and $0.13 million was received in
the Education Fund from the sales and use tax
and the purchase and use tax from economic
activity attributable to the VY Station. Lastly,
the Education Fund received a $292 million
transfer from the General Fund, of which we
estimate $2.16 million was paid from economic
activity created by the VY Station.
In total, VY Station and the economic activity which it generated throughout Vermont paid
$4.94 million in Education Fund taxes in 2009, out of the total of $1,320.6 million received by
the State.
In FY09, the Education Fund spent $1,321.8 million on 95,676 students. That is a cost of
$14,046 per student. The $4.94 million in revenues received from the VY Station were enough
to cover the entire cost of educating 352 Vermont students in 2009.
Education Fund Revenues Received
Because of the VY Station
in 2009
Tax source Revenue
VY Station $2.00
Retail sales & use $0.65
Purchase & use $0.13
Portion of General
Fund Transfer $2.16
====
Total = $4.94 million
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
8 No estimate was prepared for the impact from the electricity savings cost to Vermont businesses.
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 18
VII. The Impact on Consumers of Favorable Electricity
Prices
The VY Station has sold electricity to Vermont distribution firms (Green Mountain Power,
Central Vermont Public Service, and the Vermont Electric Cooperative) at prices below what
they would have had to pay otherwise. From 2002 to 2009 these savings have exceeded $300
million according to the Vermont Energy Partnership. In the recession year of 2009, the savings
were reduced as the price of wholesale electricity declined, however, not below the price the VY
Station sold power to the Vermont utilities.
In this section we present an analysis of the impact of favorable electricity prices on Vermont
households. We do not attempt to predict the precise impact. We do note that the savings to all
Vermont electricity purchasers has averaged over $40 million per year since 2002. To put this
number in context, we estimate the number of jobs and the payroll created throughout the state
from a $10 million savings in electricity costs to Vermont households.8 This analysis was
performed with the REDYN model.
• We estimate that for every $10 million in savings to Vermont households in lower
electricity costs, there were 71 more jobs created throughout Vermont with a payroll of
$2.7 million in 2009.
Residential sales of electricity in Vermont has averaged 37% of total electricity sales. With
annual savings of $40 million from 2002 to 2009, this implies Vermont households enjoyed
annual savings of nearly $15 million. Using the estimate bulleted above, this implies there were
106 jobs with a payroll of $4.1 million in Vermont during this period due to the electricity prices
savings to Vermont households.
This job and wage impact was not included in the analysis of this report prior to this section.
The reader can conclude the impact of the VY Station in 2009 was larger than that discussed
elsewhere in this report by some portion/multiple of the job and wage gains shown above.
Economic Impact of the VY Station January 31, 2010
Northern Economic Consulting, Inc. Westford, Vermont 05494
Page 19
VIII. Appendix - Methodology of this Analysis
The economic, demographic and fiscal impact of the future operation and eventual
decommissioning of the VY Station is measured by use of a dynamic, input-output model
developed by Regional Dynamics Inc. (“The ReDyn Model”). This model allows the estimation
of economic, fiscal and demographic impacts from 2008 through 2056.
Regional Dynamics is an economic modeling company. ReDyn offers an advanced economic
model by web subscription or batch services to consultants, agencies, firms, planners, and
analysts (users). ReDyn runs on the Internet. The model estimates the multi-regional impacts
and year-by-year (dynamic) nonlinear effects on industries, consumers, and governments from
changes in company sales, jobs, wages, or investments; changes in taxes or personal or
government spending; or public policy changes such as energy, environment, school, health, or
security measures. The results are called simulation forecasts, or simulations.
The model is a fundamental re-envisioning of economic theory applied to estimating
multi-regional, dynamic effects. It reflects advances in New Economic Geography, especially
gravity theory (regional attraction) and trade flow (regional imports/exports), based on a new
distance impedance database from Oak Ridge National Laboratories that enables calculating
trade flow by commodity by road, rail, water, air, and proxy transport. The breakthrough in
design is the commodity production linkage between the trade flow process and an entity-based
data structure for the economy. Entities include industries, workers, governments, investors,
etc., and commodities are the goods they use and make.
ReDyn is more flexible, complete, and accessible than any other modeling process available
today.
For this report we developed a four region ReDyn model. The regions are: Windham County,
the remaining counties of Vermont (called “Rest of Vermont”), Cheshire County in New
Hampshire, and Franklin County in Massachusetts. The economic impacts on the latter two
counties are not of concern to this report. However, they were included in this analysis in order
to fully measure the impact of the VY Station and increase our confidence in the reasonableness
of the ReDyn model’s estimates.

ATVs to be allowed on state land: Times Argus Online

Awesome good news!!!!! (as long as it really happens)

ATVs to be allowed on state land: Times Argus Online

Posted using ShareThis

U.S. snowboarder Pearce remains hospitalized

U.S. snowboarder Pearce remains hospitalized

Posted using ShareThis

Taxing Prosthetics?

***I am seriously hoping this is untrue. If anyone finds info to debunk this, please send it my way***

Click here for~~~Original Post

By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann 11.7.2009 Published on TheHill.com November 6, 2009

As the suicidal Democratic congressmen proceed to rubber-stamp the Obama healthcare reform despite the drubbing their party took in the ‘09 elections, the president trotted out the endorsements of the AMA and the AARP to stimulate support. But these — and the other endorsements — his package has received are all bought and paid for.

Here are the deals:

* The American Medical Association (AMA) was facing a 21 percent cut in physicians’ reimbursements under the current law. Obama promised to kill the cut if they backed his bill. The cuts are the fruit of a law requiring annual 5-6 percent reductions in doctor reimbursements for treating Medicare patients. Bravely, each year Congress has rolled the cuts over, suspending them but not repealing them. So each year, the accumulated cuts threaten doctors. By now, they have risen to 21 percent. With this blackmail leverage, Obama compelled the AMA to support his bill…or else!

* The AARP got a financial windfall in return for its support of the healthcare bill. Over the past decade, the AARP has morphed from an advocacy group to an insurance company (through its subsidiary company). It is one of the main suppliers of Medi-gap insurance, a high-cost, privately purchased coverage that picks up where Medicare leaves off. But President Bush-43 passed the Medicare Advantage program, which offered a subsidized, lower-cost alternative to Medi-gap. Under Medicare Advantage, the elderly get all the extra coverage they need plus coordinated, well-managed care, usually by the same physician. So more than 10 million seniors went with Medicare Advantage, cutting into AARP Medi-gap revenues.

Presto! Obama solved their problem. He eliminates subsidies for Medicare Advantage. The elderly will have to pay more for coverage under Medigap, but the AARP — which supposedly represents them — will make more money. (If this galls you, join the American Seniors Association, the alternative group; contact sbarton@americanseniors.org This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .)

* The drug industry backed ObamaCare and, in return, got a 10-year limit of $80 billion on cuts in prescription drug costs. (A drop in the bucket of their almost $3 trillion projected cost over the next decade.) They also got administration assurances that it will continue to bar lower-cost Canadian drugs from coming into the U.S. All it had to do was put its formidable advertising budget at the disposal of the administration.

* Insurance companies got access to 40 million potential new customers. But when the Senate Finance Committee lowered the fine that would be imposed on those who don’t buy insurance from $3,500 to $1,500, the insurance companies jumped ship and now oppose the bill, albeit for the worst of motives.

The only industry that refused to knuckle under was the medical device makers. They stood for principle and wouldn’t go along with Obama’s blackmail. So the Senate Finance Committee retaliated by imposing a tax on medical devices such as automated wheelchairs, pacemakers, arterial stents, prosthetic limbs, artificial knees and hips and other necessary accoutrements of healthcare.

So these endorsements are not freely given, but bought and paid for by an administration that is intent on passing its program at any cost.

SHC in the process of accepting insurance

From: The Melha News

(Click pic to read it)

Update on Eric Warner Case

I'm still really confused how to feel about this situation......... but here's what was in the paper

Eagle Times write up: (Click on the pics to enlarge them)

Finally some good news

Fosters.com

No jail time in Alton road death: Judge relents to wishes of victim's family

By Gail Ober
gober@citizen.com
Thursday, November 5, 2009


LACONIA — The Alton man who killed one of his passengers in a drunken driving crash in September 2008 will not serve any time behind bars, despite his guilty plea, a Superior Court judge ruled Wednesday afternoon.

Ryan Sell, 27, of 33 School St., wept as he apologized to the family of Robert H. Richey of Florida who died when the sport utility vehicle he was driving missed a poorly marked corner and ran into a culvert on Avery Hill Road.

"To sentence Ryan to jail will cause more grief and tragedy," said Megan Quinn who spoke for the entire Richey family, many of whom were in court for the sentencing hearing in Belknap County Superior Court.

"We, the family deserve, to have something positive come from this. We need something positive," she said as she pleaded with Judge Kathleen McGuire to allow Sell to continue with community service, but not to put him in jail. "We can't bear to see another life lost to the shuffle of the system."

Belknap County Attorney James Carroll had asked for Sell to serve 12 months for the vehicular homicide and had agreed to suspend a two- to four-year prison sentence for aggravated driving while intoxicated.

Sell's attorney, Mark Sisti, told McGuire Sell takes complete responsibility for what he had done and has "from the day it happened."

"I don't think taking a chance on Ryan Sell is taking a chance," continued Sisti, who said Sell does not have a drinking problem and has never used drugs or gotten even a traffic ticket.

After silently reviewing her notes for a few minutes, McGuire told those in the courtroom she could not remember a time in her 20 years on the bench when she did not impose prison on someone convicted of negligent homicide — until this time — a statement that brought tears and hugs from both Sell's friends and family as well as Richey's.

McGuire said she was "most persuaded" by Sell's intent that night, which was clearly not to drive.

According to testimony, Sell had gotten a ride to one area club with his mother-in-law and had walked to a neighboring club to meet his wife. His intent was to walk home.

Instead, Sell's uncle, Brian Eagles of Alton, asked Sell to drive him and three of his friends home, one of whom was Richey.

"His judgment was impaired but when he drank, he did not intend to drive," said McGuire who also agreed to let both sides stipulate that Sell did not drink between the time he left the club and the accident.

McGuire said she also considered the rainy, foggy evening, testimony stating the sign at the intersection was misleading and that Sell was familiar with neither the road nor the car.

"The wishes of both families is also critical," she continued. "And, by all accounts, he has been a positive hard-working member of the community."

McGuire sentenced Sell to 12 months in jail, but suspended that portion of the sentence on condition of good behavior. She also sentenced him to two to four years on the aggravated drunken driving, all suspended. He will be on probation for two years and will have to undergo an alcohol evaluation at his own expense. Sell must further perform 200 hours of community service.

The Department of Motor Vehicles suspended Sell's license for four years. However, he can reapply for it in two years.

When asked if he was satisfied with the sentencing, Carroll said the judge imparts the sentence and he respects the sentence.

"There was no way I wasn't going to ask (for jail time) because I think deterrence is important," Carroll said. "It's my job, and I will continue to do it."

Don't Use Planet Aid Yellow Boxes

I donated a bunch of clothing and shoes to the Mason's Clothe the Children project, baby blankets and newborn outfits to Valley Regional Hospital (where both my girls and I were born) and food to our local food shelf this week (I'm in super un-clutter mode...and want to give back at the same time). During my struggle with my closet and shelves, I attempted to rally up some more donations from others. When I met up with a girl in Claremont to pick up her contribution for the clothes drive she told me she was glad I found a legitamit charity because she had dropped off a bunch of clothes to the Planet Aid box and was told that the clothes deposited in them where just shreded. She was the second person to tell me something "not right" about the Yellow Boxes. Another person told me the Planet Aid people were selling them to fatten their own wallets. I was pretty annoyed by this idea since last month I brought 6 contractor bags full of coats, backpacks, shoes, clothes, whatever and deposited it into a Yellow Box. So I decided to check it out when I got home.... it isn't good. The short of it is.....don't bring anything to the Planet Aid yellow boxes. Look for a legitimate charity locally.... there are many!


http://cbs3.com/investigations/I..Team.CBS.2.309677.html

http://www.7dvt.com/2008/planet-aid-help-poor-or-charitable-pandora-s-box

http://organizer.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/thinking-outside-the-yellow-box/

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpp/news/investigative/051209_fox_5_investigation_planet_aid

For anyone wondering about Ryan.....

FYI, anyone who doesn't know the whole story, and no I'm not sharing it, Ryan is my brother-in-law. I'm just sharing what is available online. This situation sucks and Ryan is probably the last person in the world who deserves this. He was being the good guy and is getting screwed because of it. Ryan and Julie, we're all praying for you.

From fosters.com

Man charged in fatal wants blood alcohol data barred

By BEA LEWIS
bwheel@metrocast.net


Thursday, August 27, 2009
The lawyer for an Alton man charged with killing a passenger in a 2008 drunken driving crash is attempting to have blood evidence barred from court.

Ryan J. Sell, 27, of 33 School St., Alton, has been charged with negligent homicide, Driving While Intoxicated and two counts of aggravated DWI in connection with the Sept. 26, 2008, single-vehicle crash that resulted in the death of Robert H. Richie.

Sell was allegedly driving a 1982 Suburban on Avery Hill Road shortly before 11:30 p.m. when he missed the Y-shaped turn onto Alton Mountain Road in heavy fog and drove headlong into a culvert.

Alton fire rescue personnel performed cardio pulmonary resuscitation on Richie at the scene but were unable to revive him. He was pronounced death at Huggins Hospital in Wolfeboro a short time later.

Sell's attorney, Mark Sisti, has argued that Alton police did not have probable cause to arrest his client or to take his blood.

Sell sustained a head injury in the crash and police noted an egg-sized bump on his left forehead but still asked him to perform sobriety tests. Those tests, which Sell reportedly failed, resulted in police asking him to take a portable breath test, the results of which they used to arrest him.

Sisti argued in court documents that the preliminary breath test should be inadmissible because it amounted to unreasonable search and seizure. Sisti further claims police arrested Sell before they had probable cause and that the preliminary results of field sobriety tests must be thrown out since Sell was suffering from a head injury when police administered a horizontal gaze nystagmus test and a one-legged stand test.

Police testified that his eyes were jumpy consistent with someone who was intoxicated and that he lost his balance, raised his arms and put his foot down three times during the one-legged stand test.

Belknap County Attorney Jim Carroll has argued that the blood was taken properly under exigent circumstances and should be admissible in court.

A final pretrial hearing is set for Sept. 9. Jury selection is scheduled for Sept. 28. Sell remains free on $75,000 personal recognizance bail on the condition he not drive. He was also ordered to sign a waiver of extradition, which would allow him to be brought back to Laconia without further court hearing if he were to flee to avoid prosecution.

My little 'Cover Girl'

Taylor made the cover of the Compass! And so did her little friend Maebel!



Visit The Compass Online

Laurie Kathryn's Butterfly Dance

I finally managed to find Dee (Laurie's Mom) today so I could snag some fliers for this wonderful event they host every year so I can finally share the info.

Laurie Kathryn Hassett died on July 4th, 2006. She was 3 years old. News travels fast around here and I learned about it within minutes of it happening and I just about had a break down when I heard the news. Ashtyn was 2 months and some days old and I was still very post pardom crazy. Just hearing that someone lost their baby ripped me in two. I didn't even know Dee then, and I never met her beautiful little girl, but just knowing that a mother lost her child, it was more than I could take. It has been three years and I still get teary when I think of their loss. On a slightly more positive side, Laurie helped me realize my "loss" was not a loss at all and the little picture I have of her on my fridge reminds me everyday to love and cherish every second with my girls, even the very very bad seconds. Now, every year, the Hassett's host a Butterfly Dance in memory of their precious little girl. And now that I've shared a little piece of the story, and why I feel so compelled to share this with everyone, here's the flier and info:

(Click the pic for a larger view)


Patch Park in Charlestown, NH (I have linked the map to Charlestown Ambulance because even though it shows Patch Park on the map, mapquest doesn't think it has its own address.....its the same place)

Donations are accepted (recommended $10 for adults). Hope to see everyone there.... and kids, don't forget your wings.

Gary Martineau obit

Courtesy of yourclaremontpress.com

Gary Leo Martineau, 53 of Hudson, NH, died suddenly on Monday, July 13, 2009 at his home of heart failure.

He was born on July 31, 1956 in Claremont, NH to the late Rudolph and Rita (St. Sauveur) Martineau.

Gary began his career with the Army where he very proudly earned the distinction of SP/5 and a good conduct medal, serving his country twice including a tour in Germany. After serving in the military, Gary's career continued to flourish in companies in Southern, NH including Lockheed Sanders and BAE Systems, installing and maintaining radar and other systems that facilitates the national security that we all enjoy and keeps us all safe.

Gary loved and spent every minute he could outdoors. He spent most of his life kayaking, camping, rock climbing, mountain biking, and hiking. He was an avid whitewater kayaker. He belonged to and was active in many organizations to protect our rivers and streams.

He is survived by his only daughter Anna Martineau of Surprise, AZ; his sister and brother-in-law Diane (Martineau) and Roger Bruce of Enfield, NH; his sister and brother-in-law Lucille (Martineau) and David Proulx of San Jose, CA. He is also survived by several aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews and cousins.

A graveside service will be held Saturday July 25th at eleven O’clock in St. Mary Cemetery with Rev. Donna Leslie pastor of the First Congregational Church of Croydon Flat, officiating.

In his memory, we ask that you take the time to help someone out and live your life to the fullest. Donations can be made to The Nature Conservancy, Attn: Treasury, 4245 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA.

The Eagle's replacement???

If you live in my area and are like me.....you probably miss the one newspaper we had...... here is the Eagle's replacement ......... http://www.yourclaremontpress.com/

Eagle-Times, 2 other papers close doors

Snagged from http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20090710/NEWS04/907100372/1003/NEWS02

Publisher to declare bankruptcy today

By Susan Smallheer Staff Writer - Published: July 10, 2009
CLAREMONT, N.H. — As one staffer put it, the Eagle ran out of Time Thursday.The Eagle-Times, a daily newspaper that served the city of Claremont and communities on both sides of the Connecticut River, published its last edition today.Harvey Hill, publisher and owner of the paper, told employees Thursday afternoon that he would file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy today. Employees were told to turn in their keys at the end of their shift Thursday."We did our best to continue the operations, but the economy and the changes in the newspaper industry have made it impossible to continue this business. Thank you for your support over the years and the dedication you showed to his newspaper," he wrote in a staffwide e-mail."It's the paradigm shift," said one staffer, referring to the changes affecting the newspaper industry in New England and beyond, from the troubles at the Boston Globe to small-town Claremont."I'm saddened; it's awful close to home," said John Mitchell, president and publisher of the Rutland Herald, which competed head-to-head with the Eagle in many Vermont towns. "I thought smaller papers were doing OK for the most part."Eric Francis of White River Junction, who wrote for The Spectator and the Eagle-Times as a freelancer for several years, said the staff worked to get the final edition completed Thursday afternoon.He said that the closing shocked everyone. "Harvey said it was just economics," Francis said, noting the past year or so had been "rocky," with the papers experiencing a high turnover rate in editors.Staffers said the closing affects not just the Eagle-Times, but Hill's other publications including The Message, a shopper based in Chester, Vt., and the Connecticut Valley Spectator of Lebanon, N.H., both weekly publications. Hill bought the popular Message a few years ago, and started the Spectator in 2002.The news shocked not just the employees, but people who got their daily dose of hometown news and sports from the 7,800-circulation paper. On Thursday, the front page included news about the rebuilding of Aumand's, a furniture store in Walpole, N.H., which burned a year ago, and a story about how Josh the camel from Lempster, N.H., had made the record books being the first camel to make it up Mount Washington in the White Mountains."Holy smokes," said former state Sen. Edgar May of Springfield, who was the subject of a Sunday magazine feature earlier in the week."I have a special affection for American journalism for obvious reasons for having worked in it for many years," said May, who won a Pulitzer Prize for journalism in the 1960s. "It's a very sad time when any newspaper dies because a newspaper has been the centerpiece of changing public policy and improving the lives of so many people," he said."The closing of a newspaper means a little piece of democracy has died," he said. "There are some very important issues that have required skilled, intensive reporting that only newspapers can do."May's comments were typical of people contacted late Thursday, as news of the papers' closure became public.Hill, in an e-mail to employees, said he and his wife Christina could no longer afford subsidizing the paper. Hill bought the Eagle-Times about 15 years ago after a successful career in the paper manufacturing business.Hill said he and his wife had paid for the employees' health insurance through the end of July, and that employees would get their final paycheck, plus vacation pay, next week.He attributed the papers' closing to the economic crisis, as well as the widespread problems in the newspaper industry."It's very sad," said Bob Flint, executive director of the Springfield Regional Development Corp., who had worked with Hill on a variety of projects over the years."On a lot of levels, I appreciate what Harvey and Christina have done. But I know it's been a struggle. The closing will leave a huge void in this region," Flint said.The Eagle-Times was created in the 1960s with the merger of two newspapers: the Claremont Eagle and the Times-Reporter, which was based in Springfield. For years, the paper operated out of an office in downtown Claremont on Sullivan Street, but eventually it built a new plant on the outskirts of the city on River Street – with a wonderful view of Vermont.Matt DeRienzo, now the publisher of the Torrington (Conn.) Register, started at the Eagle in 1999 as a reporter and left in 2003 as managing editor."I think that Harvey and Christina have sunk so much of their personal money and time into the papers, they are not in it for the money. They cared about the community," DeRienzo said.DeRienzo said Hill, a native son of Charlestown, N.H., grew up on a farm just down the road from the paper's location on River Road. He returned to the area after a career in paper manufacturing, got bored with retirement and bought his hometown paper.But in a perfect indication of how news spreads in the 21st century, DeRienzo said he didn't hear about the closing of the Eagle from the Associated Press news wire, or a telephone call from Hill or fellow staffers, or even an e-mail, but from the social networking site Facebook.A friend, a former staffer of the Spectator, now a freelancer in New Hampshire, posted news of the paper's closing on her Facebook page, he said.susan.smallheer@rutlandherald.com

“The underlying message is that we’ve won a victory but could lose the war,”

http://galvestondailynews.com/story.lasso?ewcd=915187a8c5239d73